Demonizing reactions to the Clancy case with the label “demonic horde”

What it claims

Reactions to the Lindsay Clancy case are labeled as support for killing children and contrasted with a juror cast as standing against a “demonic horde.” References to explaining the crime through hormones are reduced to excusing murder. Judgments about such reactions are stretched into the conclusion that women cannot be trusted in positions of responsibility.

Target audience

Examples (paraphrased)

We paraphrase rather than quote: propaganda's exact wording is built to spread, so we carry the claim and not the craft. Each example cites the post it came from.

• One juror prevented a child killer’s acquittal by standing alone against a “demonic horde.”

  Benny Johnson, 4 Sept 2026

  x.com/bennyjohnson/status/2095956085689499911

• If killing children is explained through hormones, women cannot be trusted with any position of responsibility.

  Benny Johnson, 4 Sept 2026

  x.com/bennyjohnson/status/2095960808656171071

We link archived copies rather than the posts themselves, so that checking our work sends no traffic to the source. Where a platform cannot be archived, we print the post's address instead of linking it.

Goal

Intensify moral outrage and distrust among conservative voters toward women and people who express empathy in high-profile criminal cases, casting them as political opponents.

Techniques used

• Loaded LanguagePeople who express empathy are called “demons” and portrayed as part of a “horde.”
• Black-and-White Fallacy / DictatorshipEmpathy for the defendant is presented as a choice against children, leaving no room for other considerations.

The real grievance it exploits

The narrative exploits Americans’ genuine anxiety about violence against children, the need for accountability for serious crimes, and painful debates about parental responsibility.

How to counter

• Technique exposure: Terms such as “demons” and “horde” do not explain a case; they turn disagreement over empathy or responsibility into moral hostility.
• Reframe: Empathy, discussion of possible explanations, and a demand for accountability can coexist. Generalizing about all women from reactions to one case is not a basis for judging their fitness for office.

Sources (all time)

• Benny JohnsonTier 34,143,425 followers
  6 posts · 4–5 Sept 2026

  • 5 Sept · x.com/bennyjohnson/status/2096032288924426690
  • 5 Sept · x.com/bennyjohnson/status/2095996217067261957
  • 4 Sept · x.com/bennyjohnson/status/2095980018467741920
  • 4 Sept · x.com/bennyjohnson/status/2095971082456924539
  • 4 Sept · x.com/bennyjohnson/status/2095960808656171071
  • 4 Sept · x.com/bennyjohnson/status/2095956085689499911