Dismissing state capacity through the image of a government without a strategy

What it claims

Uncertainty around the war, negotiations and external support is cast as proof that Ukraine’s government has neither a defence strategy nor a peace plan. Complex military and international decisions are reduced to the leadership’s personal weakness, officials’ self-interest and concealment of the truth. Differing views on peace terms are labeled as a suppressed but supposedly dominant demand for concessions.

Target audience

Examples (paraphrased)

We paraphrase rather than quote: propaganda's exact wording is built to spread, so we carry the claim and not the craft. Each example cites the post it came from.

• The government can neither negotiate peace nor conduct the war effectively because it has no defined goals or strategic planning.

  Алексей Арестович, 8 Oct 2026 · Archived copy

• Zelenskyy will remain in power with support from Europe and the United Kingdom, elections will not be held for a long time, and the country has no vision for the future.

  Алексей Арестович, 14 Oct 2026 · Archived copy

We link archived copies rather than the posts themselves, so that checking our work sends no traffic to the source. Where a platform cannot be archived, we print the post's address instead of linking it.

Goal

To weaken Ukrainian civilians’ trust in the state leadership and present political pressure for concessions as the only practical way out.

Techniques used

• Causal OversimplificationMilitary decisions, negotiations and international relations are explained by a lack of courage or self-interest among Ukraine’s leadership.
• Black-and-White Fallacy / DictatorshipThe choice is presented as if the government must either immediately accept concessions or helplessly doom the country to a war without a future.

The real grievance it exploits

Anxiety caused by the war, threats to loved ones, disruptions to essential services, and uncertainty about negotiations and the country’s future.

How to counter

• Technique exposure: Watch for the false simplification: decisions on defence, diplomacy and partner support depend on many actors and circumstances, not merely on the character of individual officials.
• Prebunk: When a message presents social disagreement as proof of a hidden majority, separate the author’s assessment from verifiable data and do not replace discussion of peace terms with a demand for concessions.

Sources (all time)

• Украина. Спецоперация. Мониторинг СВОTier 115,784 subscribers
  2 posts · 14 Oct 2026

  • 14 Oct · t.me/MonitoringUA/95891
  • 14 Oct · t.me/MonitoringUA/95890
• Алексей АрестовичTier 1238,860 subscribers
  3 posts · 29 Sept – 14 Oct 2026

  • 14 Oct · Archived copy
  • 8 Oct · Archived copy
  • 29 Sept · Archived copy