Attributing the derailment of talks and humanitarian efforts to Ukraine

What it claims

Ukrainian actions in the Black Sea, strikes, and access to evacuation are portrayed as evidence that Kyiv does not want an agreement. Individual statements by Russian officials and politicians reduce the course of talks, food issues, and humanitarian difficulties to Ukraine’s fault. Russia is simultaneously depicted as a side that consistently chooses negotiations.

Target audience

Examples (paraphrased)

We paraphrase rather than quote: propaganda's exact wording is built to spread, so we carry the claim and not the craft. Each example cites the post it came from.

• Russia is allegedly unable to take Alyoshky residents to hospital because of Ukrainian drones and shelling.

  TASS, 24 Oct 2026

  tass.com/politics/2207197

• Ukrainian strikes on civilian sites are intended to derail peace talks.

  TASS, 23 Oct 2026

  tass.com/politics/2207097

We link archived copies rather than the posts themselves, so that checking our work sends no traffic to the source. Where a platform cannot be archived, we print the post's address instead of linking it.

Goal

To encourage Western and global audiences to place responsibility for failed talks and humanitarian arrangements on Ukraine and to increase pressure on Kyiv.

Techniques used

• Causal OversimplificationGrain arrangements without Russia are meaningless because Kyiv caused the situation in the Black Sea.
• Appeal to AuthorityEuropean politicians want the war to continue, while Kyiv does not want a negotiated settlement.

The real grievance it exploits

Anxiety about the prolongation of the war, civilian safety, the possibility of evacuation, and stable grain supplies.

How to counter

• Technique exposure: Notice the substitution: different issues—talks, grain, military strikes, and evacuation—are presented as the result of one Ukrainian cause. This pattern removes the actions and responsibility of other parties from consideration.
• Reframe: Wanting the war to end does not require treating mutual accusations as established fact. The terms of arrangements, civilian safety, and each side’s actions should be assessed separately.

Sources (all time)

• TASSTier 2~1.2M monthly visitors
  4 posts · 23–24 Oct 2026

  • 24 Oct · tass.com/world/2207201
  • 24 Oct · tass.com/politics/2207197
  • 23 Oct · tass.com/politics/2207097
  • 23 Oct · tass.com/politics/2207013
• TASS (X)Tier 260,000 followers
  1 post · 27 Sept 2026

  • 27 Sept · x.com/tassagency_en/status/2104132456261582850