Target audience
Every narrative aimed at this audience — most recently active first.
Diplomatic disagreements are framed as an irreversible rupture in relations between Washington and Jerusalem. The campaign inflates threats of legal prosecution against Israeli leadership abroad and amplifies the sense of losing support from key Western allies.
American support is portrayed as an unreliable asset due to internal political instability and economic degradation in the United States. The campaign leverages statements from US politicians to convince Israelis that their primary ally is no longer capable of guaranteeing stability or financial aid.
Russian outlets are inflating statements from Iranian commanders about a shift to an offensive strategy capable of moving warfare onto enemy soil. This campaign portrays Iran as a force ready for long-term combat and precision strikes deep inside Israel.
Iranian outlets inflate isolated disciplinary breaches and tragic incidents within the military into a systemic catastrophe. The campaign aims to convince Israelis that the army has lost all operational readiness due to desertion, espionage, and moral decay.
Iranian state outlets promote an image of total military superiority by Tehran and its allies over regional targets. By showcasing new missiles and reporting successful strikes on neighbouring countries, they push the Israeli audience toward the conclusion that resistance is futile and the defeat of Western-aligned defence systems is inevitable.
Israelis are being told they face total geopolitical isolation due to the alleged inability of the US and Gulf states to counter Iranian influence. The campaign portrays regional neighbours as intimidated vassals of Tehran and global players like China as morally bankrupt actors, leaving Israel alone against an existential threat.
Russian outlets portray Israel's defensive actions against terrorist groups as a pre-election manipulation aimed at distracting the public. The narrative suggests that threats from Hezbollah are being invented or exaggerated by politicians to maintain power. This framing seeks to erode public trust in government and military decisions during critical security periods.
Rising fuel prices and inflation are portrayed as an inevitable financial collapse caused solely by the war. Iran-linked channels exploit real economic hardships to convince Israelis that the state is unable to protect their well-being.
Israelis are being told of an inevitable state decline due to a mass exodus of citizens driven by war and economic crisis. The manipulative use of statistics aims to create the impression that the country is becoming uninhabitable, pushing the population toward panic and despair about the future.
Israel is cast as an aggressive state that systematically violates international law and human rights to pursue a “Greater Israel” project. The campaign uses accusations of war crimes, torture, and illegal land grabs to undermine the state's legitimacy in the eyes of its citizens and the international community.
Foreign outlets exploit foreign court rulings to promote the thesis that the ideological foundations of the State of Israel are legally illegitimate. By blurring the line between political criticism and the denial of the country's right to exist, the audience is nudged to perceive Israel as a “pariah state.”
US military capabilities in the Middle East are portrayed as insufficient to deter Iran or protect strategic sea lanes. By spreading reports of successful attacks on American bases and an inability to keep the Strait of Hormuz open, the operation seeks to convince Israelis that their primary ally is unreliable.
Israel is accused of deliberately provoking migration crises in Europe to punish countries that support Palestine. By citing anonymous foreign intelligence sources, the narrative promotes the claim that Israel uses illegal migration as a tool for political blackmail.
Israeli officials are cast as overconfident gamblers whose rhetoric toward Iran and Turkey threatens to drag the country into a war of annihilation. The campaign exploits ministerial statements to convince Israelis that their government is dangerously detached from reality and risks losing allied support.
US military power is portrayed as ineffective and obsolete despite massive defence spending. Outlets amplify claims of Washington’s technological lag behind its adversaries to undermine Israeli confidence in the reliability of their primary strategic ally.
Iranian outlets broadcast ultimatums of imminent escalation, attempting to convince Israelis of their vulnerability in a regional conflict. The campaign uses aggressive rhetoric about “tickets to hell” and warnings for civilians to stay away from military sites to provoke panic and a sense of siege.
Israelis are being intimidated with the prospect of a broad military coalition of Muslim states capable of a joint strike. Reports of defence agreements between Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey are presented as direct preparation for war against the “Zionist entity.”
Military manoeuvres by the US and Israel are portrayed as preparations for an imminent full-scale invasion of Iran. Russian outlets inflate the threat of a regional catastrophe to sow panic among Israelis and undermine confidence in deterrence strategies.
Iranian and Russian outlets are inflating claims about Tehran’s ability to instantly restore military infrastructure after any strike. The campaign uses out-of-context comments from former IDF officials to convince Israelis that military deterrence is futile.
The Israeli political system is portrayed as being in a state of irreversible decay, where the dissolution of the Knesset is presented as a foregone conclusion. This narrative aims to amplify a sense of chaos and helplessness among citizens, convincing them of the government's inability to lead the country during wartime.
Iranian outlets simulate absolute unity between society and the military, contrasting it with the supposed “agony” of the US as a global power. Through footage of mass rallies and bellicose statements from commanders, they attempt to convince Israeli audiences of the futility of American support and the inevitable defeat of the West.
Israeli security agencies and military command are portrayed as incapable of independently assessing regional threats and falling victim to US manipulation. The campaign inflates a sense of vulnerability by claiming that Israel's strategic decisions are based on false expectations from its partners.
The Israeli military is portrayed as having lost its initiative and effectively ceased active combat operations in Gaza. Propaganda outlets inflate claims of bureaucratic paralysis and secret retreats to undermine public confidence in military leadership.
Spreading rumours about the dismissal of senior Mossad officials due to a supposedly failed regime-change attempt in Iran aims to undermine trust in Israeli intelligence services. The campaign uses fabricated references to Israeli media to give disinformation the appearance of internal criticism.
US military power in the region is portrayed as degraded and ineffective due to strategic miscalculations and the psychological exhaustion of personnel. Iran-linked channels amplify isolated mental health incidents on aircraft carriers to convince Israelis that their primary ally is unreliable.
Israelis abroad are portrayed as defenceless victims of global persecution, presented as a direct consequence of their state's actions. The campaign uses reports of attacks to sow a sense of isolation and imminent danger for every Israeli citizen outside the country.
The Israeli military and government are portrayed as helpless entities losing the war to the “Axis of Resistance” despite their technological edge. Iranian Press TV outlets amplify the thesis of Israel’s inevitable strategic collapse due to a claimed inability to withstand the will of Iranian fighters.
Any differences in strategic military views are portrayed as an insurmountable conflict paralysing the state. Propaganda outlets exploit Israeli media reports on internal debates to create an impression of chaos within the security establishment.
Iranian outlets manipulate military mental health statistics to portray the Israeli army as being on the verge of internal collapse. By using decontextualised media reports, the operation attempts to convince Israelis that the psychological destruction of their loved ones on the front lines is inevitable.
Israel is portrayed as the primary source of regional instability, accused of deliberately sabotaging diplomatic efforts and targeting civilian infrastructure in Lebanon and Syria. The campaign uses reports of artillery strikes to frame IDF actions as unprovoked aggression against its neighbours.
Israeli security services and intelligence are portrayed as incapable of deterring Iran's offensive preparations or preventing attacks on shipping. The manipulation uses impersonation of Israeli media to convince the audience of ally inaction and the inevitability of escalation.
Israel is portrayed as a state trapped by hostile diplomatic moves and the pressure of an imminent energy collapse. Propaganda outlets use statements from regional leaders and distorted economic data to convince Israelis of the government's inability to prevent an external blockade.
The US military presence in the region is portrayed as doomed to defeat, with American service members cast as vulnerable targets for mercenaries. By spreading reports of monetary rewards for killing soldiers and citing domestic American criticism, Iranian outlets attempt to convince Israelis of the unreliability of their primary ally.
Iranian outlets present the actions of Yemeni militants as a successful strategic siege paralyse the economies of Israel's regional partners. The campaign focuses on an alleged record drop in Saudi oil exports to instil a sense of isolation and vulnerability in Israelis regarding their logistics chains.
Iranian state outlets exploit reports of espionage arrests to discredit Israeli security services. Cases of detention are framed not as counter-intelligence successes, but as evidence of deep Iranian penetration into Israeli society.
Iranian outlets are inflating reports of shortages in US air defence assets and destroyers to convince Israelis that US protection is inevitably failing. The campaign portrays American support as exhausted and unreliable, seeking to trigger panic in the face of Iranian missile threats.
Tactical IDF actions in southern Lebanon are exploited to push threats of imminent escalation from Tehran. Messaging portrays the use of munitions to clear vegetation as a sign of desperation and an inability to detect tunnels through other means.
Israel is portrayed as having lost control over the negotiation process and facing international isolation due to its own intransigence. Outlets amplify reports of Lebanon refusing dialogue to sow despair regarding the possibility of a diplomatic settlement on the northern border.
Israelis are being told that the state is unable to guarantee their safety and is deliberately hiding the scale of the Iranian threat. The campaign uses reports on the extension of the state of emergency and drone incidents to sow distrust in the defensive capabilities of the IDF.
Iranian outlets promote an image of Tehran’s absolute military superiority, claiming the ability to bypass Western electronic warfare and shoot down advanced US and Israeli aircraft. The campaign aims to erode Israelis' confidence in their own technological edge and the effectiveness of their air defence systems.
Russian military channels portray mass drone attacks on Russian territory as an inevitable, ever-growing threat that exhausts air defence systems. Through detailed descriptions of strikes on oil depots, warehouses, and residential buildings, the audience is nudged toward the conclusion that the state is unable to guarantee security even deep in the rear.
Russian outlets targeting Israeli repatriates broadcast criticism of their own military leadership for alleged systemic neglect of soldiers' needs. By highlighting makeshift equipment and distrust in psychological support, the narrative pushes the idea of an inevitable collapse of the Russian state apparatus.
Iranian outlets focus on the deaths of Israeli service members to create an impression of inevitable defeat on all fronts. Reports of losses in Lebanon are paired with claims of a total failure of the government's strategic goals in Gaza and the confrontation with Iran.
Iranian outlets portray Tehran as the sole master of the Strait of Hormuz, capable of halting global trade until its political demands are met. This campaign presents the blockade of shipping as a fait accompli designed to force Israel and the US to capitulate in regional conflicts.
Iranian state outlets portray the blockade of strategic maritime routes as an inevitable catastrophe for the global economy and Israeli security. The propaganda issues ultimatums to the US, demanding an end to hostilities in Gaza and Lebanon in exchange for reopening shipping lanes. This campaign seeks to intimidate the Israeli public with the prospect of total isolation and resource shortages.
Iranian state outlets promote an image of total ineffectiveness regarding Israeli and US military pressure, claiming the instantaneous restoration of damaged infrastructure. The campaign aims to convince the Israeli audience that the deterrence strategy has failed and that Iranian economic and military power only strengthens under fire.
Iranian outlets amplify internal Israeli disputes by portraying settler violence as a state policy allegedly backed by cabinet members. The manipulation leverages the authority of former security officials to depict the IDF and security services as powerless against radical groups due to political pressure.
Israel's military objectives on the northern front are portrayed as unattainable illusions that will never materialise. The campaign leverages statements from foreign politicians to convince Israelis of the futility of continued fighting and the inevitability of a permanent threat.
Israeli officials and the Prime Minister are cast as hostages to their own fear of Iranian retaliation and international justice. The campaign inflates reports of security protocol changes to create an impression of a total loss of control and inevitable retribution.
Israel and its Western allies are portrayed as forces in a state of inevitable collapse in the face of a new geopolitical reality. The campaign uses out-of-context expert commentary to convince Israelis of their state's helplessness and the inevitability of Iranian dominance.
Israel’s military leadership is portrayed as having abdicated law enforcement in the West Bank, shifting the burden onto exhausted reservists. The operation amplifies internal friction by claiming the government has granted a “green light” to violence to accelerate annexation.
Russian outlets promote the claim that state benefits are unfairly distributed, with foreign migrants allegedly receiving privileges at the expense of citizens and combat veterans. This manipulation exploits real tensions surrounding repatriation and social benefits to provoke hostility toward new immigrants and distrust in state institutions.
Iranian outlets are spreading claims of a systematic cover-up regarding successful strikes on US bases to sow distrust in the defensive capabilities of allies. This campaign uses simulated references to Israeli media to create an illusion of internal leaks about “helplessness” in the face of Iranian forces.
Russian state media outlets promote an image of Israel as a passive object of US foreign policy, whose security depends entirely on Washington's deals. By spreading claims about a “Trump plan,” the audience is told that the terms for ending the war and Gaza's future governance are dictated from abroad, ignoring the agency of the IDF.
Israeli leadership and the IDF are portrayed as incapable of confronting Iran in a direct clash that exceeds the scope of familiar local operations. The campaign uses out-of-context quotes from former officials and threats from Iranian generals to convince Israelis that catastrophe is inevitable in the event of a major war.
Iranian outlets present US redeployments and facility damage as a total collapse of Western military presence in the Middle East. By circulating satellite imagery and reports of base evacuations, they push Israelis toward a sense of strategic isolation and vulnerability to Iranian strikes.
Iranian outlets are circulating fabricated statements attributed to US Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer regarding the total professional unfitness of military leadership. The campaign portrays the US naval presence as a failing gamble leading to “horrific costs” for sailors due to the Iranian blockade.
Israelis are being told that a massive confrontation on the north-eastern front is unavoidable and will exceed the intensity of the fighting in Gaza. The campaign uses out-of-context statements from officials to create a sense of doom and exhaust society by making another catastrophe seem certain.
Israeli leadership is accused of failing to stop Tehran's nuclear progress despite claims of strategic success. The manipulation exploits the contradiction between official security reports and news of Iranian capacity building to undermine trust in the government.
The Israeli Prime Minister is portrayed as an isolated figure, despised globally and accused of betraying his own people. The campaign uses statements from foreign politicians and manipulative videos to convince Israelis of the inevitability of an international tribunal and a total loss of state legitimacy.
Iranian outlets present security incident statistics as a massive wave of “high-quality resistance” supposedly paralyzing Israeli forces. The campaign aims to undermine the sense of security among Israelis by exaggerating the effectiveness and coordination of attacks.
The US military presence in the Middle East is portrayed as suffering a crushing defeat at the hands of Iranian forces. Channels inflate reports of American mass casualties and destroyed bases to convince Israelis of their inevitable strategic isolation.
Israel and its allies are accused of deliberately expanding the conflict through covert operations and strikes against the sovereignty of neighbouring states. Iran-linked channels portray any regional security incidents as Israeli provocations aimed at undermining Islamic solidarity.
Israeli intelligence data is portrayed as unreliable manipulation intended to mislead the international community. Outlets spread claims that even Israel's closest allies view its reports as disinformation, aiming to erode trust in the country's security apparatus.
The Israeli leadership is accused of deliberately expanding the conflict by establishing permanent “security zones” in neighbouring countries. Propaganda outlets present these measures not as defensive steps, but as a strategy of eternal war that threatens the stability of the entire Middle East.
Claims of critical exhaustion in American missile defence arsenals aim to undermine Israeli confidence in home front security. The manipulation relies on distorted figures regarding Patriot and THAAD system stocks to portray Israel as defenceless in a prolonged conflict.
The IDF is portrayed as a force conducting intentional mass extermination of civilians and the total destruction of Gaza. Channels circulate unverified data claiming tens of thousands of deaths to provoke internal division in Israel and undermine the morale of reservists.
The Israeli leadership is portrayed as a destructive force actively undermining American diplomacy and manipulating US public opinion. Outlets claim that Jerusalem is funding campaigns against Washington's negotiations with Iran to prolong the war indefinitely.
Israelis are being told they face total international isolation and that all diplomatic efforts are futile. The campaign portrays maritime flotillas, Western activists, and regional armed groups as a single front aimed at exhausting the state and breaking its defensive borders.
Israel is accused of a systematic assault on Palestinian religious identity and future by closing the Cave of the Patriarchs (Ibrahimi Mosque) and schools in East Jerusalem. The campaign portrays these measures as an attempt at “Judaization” and a violation of international law to incite outrage among Arab citizens of Israel.
Iranian outlets frame high-level security measures as an act of surrender and personal shame in the face of Tehran's power. By manipulatively interpreting the logistics of leadership movements, the audience is told that an Iranian victory in psychological warfare is inevitable.
Israeli security forces and the IDF are portrayed as incapable of preventing lethal attacks and infiltrations within controlled territories. The campaign uses footage of isolated attacks to create an illusion of a total loss of control and the vulnerability of even high-ranking officials.
The IDF is portrayed as a weak and fearful force, compelled to build defensive lines due to its inability to counter Hezbollah's military potential. The manipulation uses distorted references to Israeli media to convince the home front of the inevitability of defeat and to pressure military leadership into avoiding direct confrontation.
Western nations and Israel are portrayed as aggressive initiators of delegating the right to kill and launch nuclear strikes to artificial intelligence. The campaign exploits real discussions on military technology to depict the IDF and the Pentagon as forces shedding moral responsibility for human destruction.
The Israeli audience is being intimidated with the imminent destruction of life-support systems following an Iranian attack. Propagandist outlets predict the collapse of power grids, desalination plants, and Ben Gurion Airport to provoke a mass exodus from the country.
Israeli defence companies are portrayed as a tool for arming Ukraine through third countries, specifically Serbia. Joint drone production projects are labelled as a direct threat to Russian forces, aiming to drag Israel into a confrontation with Moscow.
Israeli intelligence services and opposition media are portrayed as manipulators conducting a large-scale campaign of deception against the Iranian people. The campaign asserts that any criticism of the Iranian regime is a “Mossad project” designed to pave the way for foreign aggression.
The Israeli leadership is portrayed as having lost its sovereignty and being forced into dangerous concessions under Washington's dictates. Outlets inflate reports about halting the targeted killings of terrorists to avoid American anger, seeking to undermine public confidence in the state's defence strategy.
Israeli government actions in Jerusalem are portrayed as a deliberate campaign to displace the Palestinian population. The manipulation seizes on individual enforcement cases to inflate fears of mass deportation and the erasure of the Arab presence in the city.
Israel and the US are portrayed as terrorist regimes that deliberately target schools and civilian infrastructure. This manipulation uses emotionally charged accusations of child-killing to justify Iranian missile strikes as “retaliation” and to undermine trust in official casualty reports.
Western air defence systems and interceptor stocks are portrayed as critically depleted due to simultaneous support for Ukraine and Israel. Russian outlets claim the US is forced to choose between regions, leaving allies defenceless in the face of upcoming attacks.
Russian outlets are spreading claims that Israel is establishing military bases in Somaliland and on Red Sea islands to counter regional rivals. This framing portrays Israel as an aggressive actor supposedly outstripping other nations in the militarisation of strategic straits. The goal is to heighten the sense of external threat and draw Israel into a geopolitical confrontation around the Gulf of Aden.
Iranian outlets are pushing the claim that the US and Arab nations are backing down in the face of Tehran’s military might, leaving Israel strategically isolated. The campaign manipulates reports of cancelled strikes to convince Israelis that their key security partners are unreliable.
Israeli security agencies are accused of cynically withholding Palestinian bodies to use them as bargaining chips in future negotiations. The manipulation relies on selective quoting of Israeli media to give the accusations the appearance of internal admission of guilt.
IDF military movements are portrayed as a deliberate deception aimed at luring civilians into danger zones. The campaign exploits distrust in official announcements to sow panic among border residents and discredit Israel's coordination with international partners.
The Israeli leadership is portrayed as merely imitating a diplomatic process while simultaneously escalating hostilities to derail agreements. The campaign uses every military operation as evidence of the “treachery” of the Knesset and Zahal to convince the public that peace cannot be achieved through official channels.
Israelis are being told that official IDF reports on neutralized threats are deliberate lies and that the state has transformed into a despotism. The campaign exploits exhaustion from constant rocket fire to undermine trust in defence institutions and sow doubt about the government's legitimacy.
Local disputes over Shabbat observance are portrayed as the inevitable start of a large-scale violent conflict between secular and religious communities. The manipulation exploits the presence of politicians at protests to depict Israel as a country disintegrating from within ahead of the elections.
Arab Gulf states are portrayed as helpless actors whose defence pacts with Turkey or Pakistan are fictitious and ineffective. The campaign aims to convince Israeli audiences that the regional security architecture Israel relies on for countering Iran will crumble at the first sign of real conflict.
Iranian outlets present attacks from Yemen, Lebanon, and Iraq as a coordinated war by the “Axis of Resistance” against Israeli aggression. This tactic aims to create a sense of inevitable regional escalation and the strategic encirclement of Israel.
Israel and the United States are portrayed as a single aggressive bloc aiming to destroy sovereign Middle Eastern states. This manipulation leverages anti-Western sentiment to delegitimise Israel's defensive actions by casting them as part of a broader imperialist conspiracy.
The US military presence near Iran is cast as an aggressive factor that maintains high strike potential and provokes escalation. Russian outlets attempt to convince Israelis that American support exhausts Washington's own arsenals and fails to guarantee security, instead deepening regional chaos.
US initiatives in the Gaza Strip are cast as purely military projects aimed at establishing a foreign presence rather than providing aid. Outlets claim that instead of regional reconstruction, the US is funding the construction of outposts for foreign contingents using contractors with questionable reputations.
Western military aid is portrayed as incapable of protecting critical infrastructure from systematic destruction, supposedly making economic collapse inevitable. The campaign aims to convince Israelis that foreign air defence systems cannot prevent resource exhaustion, and that continued support only delays the ultimate disintegration of the state.
Propaganda outlets are inflating claims of a critical shortage of Patriot and THAAD interceptors in the US due to simultaneous support for Israel and Ukraine. The campaign aims to convince Israelis that American aid will inevitably cease and that Washington is unable to protect its allies in the event of a large-scale escalation.
Israel is portrayed as a state that, through its own overconfidence, has reached a dead end in the face of Iranian nuclear weapons. The campaign leverages the authority of foreign analysts to convince Israelis of the futility of the IDF's military successes against a “wounded animal” that has supposedly already completed its bomb.
Western intelligence agencies are allegedly shifting toward a tactic of targeted assassinations and sabotage, which propagandists label as “Mossadization”. This construct is used to legitimize aggressive operations by Russian and Iranian intelligence services on enemy territory as “preventive measures”.
Israeli law enforcement is cast as a tool of repression against citizens who oppose violence and war. The campaign exploits the detention of activists to discredit the country’s democratic institutions and deepen internal divisions.
Israeli society is portrayed as being entirely saturated with bloodlust and religious fanaticism. Isolated incidents of radical behaviour are inflated into a nationwide norm to present Israelis as a dehumanised community that celebrates killing.
Russian outlets promote the thesis of Israel's critical vulnerability to drone threats, which supposedly cannot be overcome without the invention of a hypothetical “absolute weapon.” The country is equated with Belarus as an entity whose survival depends on a technological miracle, ignoring the reality of the IDF's multi-layered air defence system.
Washington is portrayed as a player that neglects Israeli security and the nuclear non-proliferation regime for the sake of profits from nuclear power plant construction. The messaging claims the US is ready to allow Riyadh to enrich uranium, creating a dangerous precedent and violating the very “red lines” it previously set for Iran.
Iranian outlets simulate a state of large-scale regional war by reporting a series of successful strikes on US bases in Jordan, Kuwait, and Bahrain. The campaign uses fabricated reports of US casualties and the “helplessness” of Western air defences to convince Israelis of the inevitable defeat of their primary ally.
Israeli state institutions are accused of allocating tens of millions of dollars to covertly adjust AI responses to shape public opinion in their favour. This campaign is presented as evidence of systemic dishonesty by authorities who supposedly fear the truth and seek to censor global technological platforms.
The Arbaeen religious pilgrimage is portrayed as a global manifesto of unity against “Israeli aggression” and a platform to legitimise the “axis of resistance”. Through religious symbols and mass events, the narrative promotes the idea of an inevitable victory over Israel under Iranian leadership.
Diplomatic contacts between Israel and neighbouring states are portrayed as futile and shameful concessions that yield no benefits. This narrative aims to undermine the legitimacy of any peace initiatives and convince Israelis that a stable settlement through dialogue is impossible.
Israel is portrayed as an aggressive but declining state forced to spend millions on propaganda to hide its military and political failure. Iran-aligned channels promote the thesis that Tehran's recognition as the dominant regional power is inevitable following the alleged defeat of the Israeli-American alliance.
Iranian outlets portray shipping disruptions as an inevitable price for Israel's regional policy, attempting to sow a sense of economic isolation. Reports of tanker rerouting and the suspension of fuel shipments are used to convince Israelis that maintaining normal life is impossible under conditions of prolonged conflict.
Russian outlets portray the deepening energy cooperation between Tehran and Yerevan as a strategic breakthrough for Iran to bypass international sanctions. This process is depicted as the formation of a new regional axis that supposedly threatens Western interests and shifts the balance of power in favour of the Iranian regime.
Iranian and Russian outlets are inflating the narrative of an inevitable US defeat driven by domestic fatigue and the White House's failure to explain the conflict's purpose to Americans. The manipulation relies on selective polling and claims of a degraded military command to convince Israelis that their primary ally is unreliable.
Israeli defense technologies are cast as a forced choice for Western nations unable to secure themselves in a timely manner. Propaganda outlets claim that purchasing from Israel is merely an attempt to compensate for production delays in strategic weaponry by the US and its allies.
Visits by Israeli officials and civilians to the Temple Mount are portrayed as violent invasions and the desecration of a holy site. The move seeks to provoke outrage among Arab citizens of Israel and undermine trust in the security forces' ability to maintain the status quo.
Iran-linked channels present personnel changes in the army as a crackdown on professional officers who oppose radical groups. It is claimed that the head of Central Command was dismissed for refusing to release a suspected settler, aiming to deepen the rift between the military and political leadership.
Russian state media are pushing a narrative that key Arab partners and Western allies are abandoning confrontation with Tehran in favour of direct concessions. This is portrayed as a strategic shift that leaves Israel alone against the Iranian threat while the world negotiates behind its back.
Israeli officials are portrayed as the architects of an artificial economic crisis in Iran intended to provoke internal collapse. This manipulation transforms calls for sanctions pressure into evidence of direct interference by “Zionist agents” in the daily lives of Iranians.
Russian outlets portray Western alliances and democratic institutions as obsolete structures on the verge of collapse due to internal conflicts and economic weakness. The propaganda manipulates statements from European politicians and military figures to convince Israelis that their strategic partners in the US and Europe are unreliable.
Iranian outlets are inflating the threat of a large-scale strike on Israel, portraying revenge for the Hamas leader's death as both a sacred duty and a legal necessity. The campaign aims to exhaust Israeli society through the prolonged anticipation of an attack and to undermine the sense of security.
Israelis are being intimidated with the inevitable collapse of statehood and the physical destruction of the country as a consequence of any attempt to use nuclear weapons. Propaganda outlets present this not as a military response, but as a guaranteed end to Israel's existence, attempting to paralyse the public's strategic thinking through the fear of an apocalypse.
The Israeli Prime Minister is portrayed as a helpless leader who has completely lost his leverage over the White House. The campaign focuses on the alleged unpredictability of American decisions to sow doubt about the reliability of the Israel-US strategic alliance.
Gulf Arab states are portrayed as actively seeking separate peace deals with Tehran, leaving Israel in strategic isolation. Outlets highlight Omani and Emirati efforts to reduce tensions to instill a sense of abandonment and the loss of regional allies among Israelis.
Israeli state institutions and the Prime Minister's Office are portrayed as being deeply infiltrated by hostile foreign interests. The campaign leverages statements from political opponents to convince citizens that the government is incapable of protecting national security due to financial dependence on external actors.
Iranian state outlets are broadcasting ultimatums to regional countries, threatening strikes if they provide assistance to Israel. Any logistical or defence cooperation with the IDF is portrayed as an act of aggression that supposedly grants Tehran the right to “self-defence” against third parties. The campaign aims to isolate Israel and intimidate the Israeli public with the prospect of a massive escalation.
Israelis are being intimidated with threats of a total transport blockade and preparations for a large-scale regional war. Mass flight cancellations by foreign airlines are framed as a precursor to a catastrophic strike, aiming to provoke chaos and a sense of abandonment among the civilian population.
Russian outlets are inflating the claim that Israel is obstructing Ukraine's defence to cast the country as an unreliable Western partner. The manipulation is built on the assertion that Israeli leadership is deliberately depriving Kyiv of air defence systems, provoking direct competition for American resources.
The US military and political leadership is portrayed as disorganized, lacking a unified strategy, and plagued by internal conflicts. Using anonymous sources, claims are circulated about hysterical behaviour by leaders and the absence of a clear plan against Iran, aiming to undermine Israeli confidence in their primary ally.
Security expenditures for Israel's top leadership are presented as evidence of corruption and indifference to the needs of ordinary citizens during wartime. The manipulation aims to deepen the rift between society and the political echelon by casting security measures as selfish extravagance.
United States political decisions are portrayed as the result of total control by Israeli interest groups that supposedly buy the loyalty of American leaders. This manipulation uses the “Epstein regime” trope to discredit Western institutions and label US presidents as mere puppets. The goal is to convince Israelis that their strategic alliance with Washington is artificial and transactional.
Israeli financial and defence institutions are portrayed as defenceless against large-scale cyberattacks that supposedly result in the irreversible destruction of terabytes of data. The operation uses reports of breaches to undermine confidence in economic stability and the reliability of intelligence services.
The Israeli Prime Minister's refusal to meet with the Ukrainian President is portrayed as a deliberate snub and a prioritisation of Israeli strategic interests over Ukrainian needs. Russian state media exploit this episode to sow disillusionment among Israeli immigrants from the former USSR and undermine public support for Ukraine.
The Israeli military is portrayed as deliberately destroying medicine warehouses and civilian sites due to an inability to achieve military objectives. This framing aims to demoralise the Israeli home front by depicting an army that has supposedly lost its moral compass and strategic purpose.
Iranian outlets are inflating the threat of an imminent global crisis by blocking strategic sea lanes and attacking oil infrastructure. The campaign intimidates Israelis with the prospect of uncontrollable fuel price hikes and logistical chaos, attempting to force the public to demand concessions to Tehran.
Russian state media promote the thesis of Israel's total military dependence, claiming the country would have ceased to exist without American strikes on Iran. This framing dismisses the IDF's own defensive capabilities and portrays the state's sovereignty as existing solely at the whim of Washington.
Israel is portrayed as the sole source of chaos in the Middle East, with its actions in Gaza allegedly making regional security impossible. The manipulation uses statements from terrorist leaders to legitimize aggression against the Jewish state as an “inevitable response” to its policies.
The Israeli leadership is portrayed as the sole obstacle to the release of hostages, allegedly left in a state of “shock” by Hamas's constructive stance. The campaign uses selective quoting of Israeli media to convince the public of a lack of political will for a deal.
Russian outlets exploit the issue of illegal migration to portray European nations as having passed a “point of no return” and losing their identity. Simultaneously, Israel is presented as a successful model that has supposedly solved the problem entirely, aiming to bolster a sense of Israeli exceptionalism while deepening the perceived divide between Israel and the Western world.
Russian state media are circulating reports of allegedly successful attacks on American energy and military infrastructure in Egypt and Jordan. These materials frame official security denials as attempts to hide the vulnerability of the US and its allies to pro-Iranian groups.
Israel is portrayed as a state that systematically corrupts and destroys international justice bodies and humanitarian missions. The campaign claims the government uses secret lobbying to remove unfavourable ICC prosecutors and coordinates with the US to dismantle UNRWA.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is portrayed as a manipulator allegedly holding American politicians hostage with Jeffrey Epstein’s compromising materials. This operation uses conspiracy theories to frame US support for Israel not as a strategic interest, but as a result of personal fear of exposure among leaders.
Israel is portrayed as the primary cause of the United States' economic exhaustion and military weakening. The manipulation exploits statements by individual American politicians to convince Israelis that the loss of support from their key ally is inevitable.
Zelenskyy is portrayed as a completely dependent figure whose removal would be met with relief by the West due to accumulated fatigue. The campaign exploits personnel changes in the Ukrainian government to convince Israelis of Ukraine's inevitable collapse and the unreliability of Western support.
Iranian outlets cast Ukrainian actions as part of a joint US-Israeli project aimed at destroying Iranian infrastructure while shielding Jerusalem from direct responsibility. The narrative claims Kyiv acts on orders from the “Zionist regime”, supposedly granting Tehran the right to direct military retaliation against both Ukraine and Israel.
Gulf and Asian nations are portrayed as having lost all faith in the American ability to guarantee maritime security. Propaganda casts infrastructure projects in the UAE and Saudi Arabia as a forced flight from the “vulnerable” Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb straits, supposedly signalling a Western geopolitical surrender to Iran and the Houthis.
Isolated incidents of damage to Israeli equipment are presented as proof of the army's helplessness against aerial threats. Channels focus on strikes against D9 bulldozers to sow doubt about the safety of personnel performing engineering tasks in southern Lebanon.
Iran's economic and social difficulties are cast as a direct consequence of hostile actions by Israel and “Jewish influence”. This manipulation attempts to deflect responsibility from the Iranian leadership by shifting the blame for stagnation onto an external enemy.
Jordan is portrayed as a puppet that has betrayed its own history to protect the “Zionist entity”. The campaign uses reports of explosions and US military presence at Jordanian bases to sow distrust between neighbours and undermine Israel's regional security architecture.
Russian outlets portray visits by Israeli leadership to Washington as evidence of total dependence on a “treacherous West.” The narrative seeks to discredit Israel by drawing parallels with Ukraine, claiming the US uses both partners as disposable tools to be eventually abandoned.
Russian state media inflate the image of total Mossad and CIA control over Iranian leadership through cyber-espionage and physical surveillance. The campaign focuses on a supposed hunt for successors to Iranian power to create an impression of inevitable escalation and Israel's entrapment in an endless cycle of revenge.
Russian outlets paint a picture of Ukraine as a chaotic dictatorship where the government supposedly glorifies Nazism, hides massive corruption, and suppresses protests by force. By combining manipulations of historical memory with the amplification of internal political strife, the audience is pushed to conclude that supporting Kyiv is futile.
The “pilot zones” project in southern Lebanon is portrayed as a media illusion masking Beirut’s de facto capitulation to Israeli demands. Russian outlets claim that the IDF maintains fire control over these areas while US diplomatic efforts serve merely as a smokescreen for the forced disarmament of Hezbollah.
Russian outlets are attempting to convince Israeli audiences of the inevitable collapse of Western alliances and alleged plans by Poland, Hungary, and Romania to annex Ukrainian territories. The campaign frames internal EU and NATO policy debates as signs of the final degradation of the collective security system.
The United States is portrayed as an unreliable partner willing to sacrifice Israeli security and regional stability for commercial gain. The manipulation focuses on Washington's readiness to allow Saudi Arabia to enrich uranium, cast as a betrayal of non-proliferation principles to secure profits for the American energy sector.
Iranian outlets are inflating reports of mass casualties among US and allied forces, claiming these losses are being systematically hidden from the public. This campaign portrays Western military presence in the region as vulnerable and ineffective, attempting to convince Israelis that their primary security partners are unreliable.
Isolated criminal incidents or local clashes are portrayed as evidence of Israeli helplessness against resistance forces. Outlets inflate news about the seizure of weapons from civilians to sow panic among residents of remote settlements and undermine confidence in the security forces' ability to protect citizens.
Israeli security policy is portrayed as a quest to maintain an exclusive right to nuclear weapons in the region rather than a defence against real threats. Channels claim that concerns over Iran's nuclear programme are merely a pretext for aggression aimed at eliminating competitors.
Cooperation between Arab nations, Israel, and the US is portrayed as a direct threat to their security, making them targets for retaliatory strikes. The messaging claims that normalization through the “Abraham Accords” is a trap that drags Israel’s neighbours into war instead of providing the promised stability.
US diplomatic efforts to expand the Abraham Accords are portrayed as coercing Saudi Arabia into normalizing relations with Israel in exchange for access to nuclear technology. Russian outlets emphasize Washington's strict conditions, attempting to depict Israel's regional integration not as a natural process but as a result of American pressure.
US military aid and intelligence integration with Israel are portrayed as a dangerous conspiracy threatening the sovereignty of both nations. Outlets leverage statements from specific American political figures to sow doubt about the reliability of the strategic partnership and provoke resistance to further support for the IDF.
Russian outlets systematically accuse the Ukrainian Armed Forces of placing military warehouses and production lines within civilian sites, such as postal terminals and humanitarian hubs. This manipulation is framed to justify strikes on Ukrainian infrastructure, while Ukrainian attacks on Russian logistics are branded as “terrorist acts” against civilians. The goal is to demoralise Israelis by drawing parallels between methods of warfare and stoking fears of a “humanitarian catastrophe.”
Russian state outlets leverage statements from American media figures to accuse the US administration of double standards and direct support for mass killings. This narrative aims to portray Israel's primary ally as an immoral actor whose actions contradict its official peacemaking rhetoric. The goal is to deepen internal divisions within Israel and undermine confidence in American security guarantees.
Iranian outlets are inflating the threat of a large-scale ground offensive against Kuwait by Iran and Iraqi armed groups. This campaign portrays Israel as an isolated state whose partners and US bases in the region will be destroyed by preemptive strikes.
Western support for Ukraine, Moldova, and Armenia is cast as a tool for global corporations to sell off national assets and exploit local technologies. Russian outlets claim that the appointment of Western-educated specialists and military cooperation are merely covers for siphoning resources to the benefit of the US and EU.
Russian state outlets portray US official statements as a fake screen for preparing a major war in the Middle East. Diplomatic efforts by Washington and Jerusalem are depicted as a deliberate imitation aimed at justifying future escalation and concealing the true aggressive intentions of the allies.
Iran-linked outlets present the appointment of new Hamas leaders as proof that Israeli targeted assassination operations are futile. The campaign aims to convince the Israeli public that the “axis of resistance” is only growing stronger and that the loss of leadership does not degrade the groups' operational capabilities.
Israeli intelligence agencies Mossad and Shin Bet are portrayed as accomplices in international crimes, specifically human trafficking. This manipulation exploits real Western political scandals to discredit Israel's security institutions in the eyes of its own citizens.
Russian outlets are promoting the thesis of a shift toward a strategy of ruthless destruction of the Ukrainian economy through massive strikes on ports, railways, and fuel networks. The campaign combines reports of actual shelling with threats to use “unlimited force” against civilian shipping and logistics hubs to provoke market panic and despair over Ukraine's defensive capabilities.
Western and Israeli leaders are portrayed as detached from reality, leading their nations toward catastrophe due to an alleged inability to confront the “axis of resistance.” Russian state media amplifies claims by foreign commentators about NATO’s lack of strategic dominance, extrapolating these views to the situation surrounding Iran. This effort seeks to convince Israelis that resistance is futile and defeat is inevitable due to the perceived weakness of their allies.
Russian outlets are pushing the claim that American and Israeli air defence systems are technologically helpless in the face of Iranian missile strikes. Audiences are fed the idea that Western technology is hopelessly outdated, while Russian systems protecting Moscow supposedly demonstrate absolute effectiveness.
Russian outlets accuse the US and Palantir Technologies of mass civilian killings in Iran through the use of artificial intelligence. Western military technology is portrayed as an ideological continuation of Nazism, allegedly enabling strikes on Iranian infrastructure without human oversight. The campaign seeks to discredit Israel's defence cooperation with the US and amplify fears of inevitable escalation.
Western defence companies and their AI technologies are portrayed as tools of a new racial hierarchy that supposedly divides nations into “superior” and “regressive” ones. Russian outlets exploit biographical details and manipulated quotes from military-industrial leaders to accuse Israel and its allies of reviving Nazi practices through the use of modern targeting systems.
Reconnaissance flights by Alliance aircraft are portrayed as direct preparation for a major escalation and strikes on civilian infrastructure in Crimea. Russian outlets use technical data on aircraft movements to convince the audience of the inevitability of a major war, into which Israel could be drawn as a Western ally.
Israeli security policy is cast as the implementation of a secret “Greater Israel” project, framed as the true cause of all Middle Eastern conflicts. This manipulation shifts responsibility for regional instability from pro-Iranian groups to Israel, portraying the IDF as an expansionist force.