Stoking resentment by portraying checkpoints as a “waste” of military resources

What it claims

Security forces at checkpoints are cast as excessive and detached from front-line needs. This framing aims to convince the audience that a significant number of trained personnel are supposedly avoiding combat by checking civilians in the rear.

Target audience

Examples (paraphrased)

We paraphrase rather than quote: propaganda's exact wording is built to spread, so we carry the claim and not the craft. Each example cites the post it came from.

• There is an entire brigade standing at the checkpoints, which would be enough to retake Pokrovsk.

  ШЕЛЕСТ, 17 Aug 2026 · Archived copy

• The number of military personnel checking documents in the rear is disproportionate to the shortage of people on the front line.

  ШЕЛЕСТ, 17 Aug 2026 · Archived copy

We link archived copies rather than the posts themselves, so that checking our work sends no traffic to the source. Where a platform cannot be archived, we print the post's address instead of linking it.

Goal

To provoke conflicts between civilians and the military, and to undermine trust in the strategic allocation of manpower within the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

Techniques used

• Loaded LanguageUse of profanity and emotional exclamations to create an impression of absurdity regarding the situation at the checkpoint.
• Causal OversimplificationThe claim that the presence of personnel at a single checkpoint is sufficient to “take back” an entire city on the front line.

The real grievance it exploits

Societal exhaustion from the prolonged war and anxiety over the difficult situation in volatile front-line sectors, such as the Pokrovsk direction.

How to counter

• Reframe: Checkpoints perform critical counter-sabotage tasks and weapon detection, and their personnel often consist of units that are not assault-oriented by specialization.

Sources (all time)

• ШЕЛЕСТTier 1137,608 subscribers
  1 post · 17 Aug 2026

  • 17 Aug · Archived copy