Portraying officials as privileged and detached from soldiers

What it claims

The posts cast mention of an MP’s expensive cars and discussion of military pay as an image of officials for whom war and the absence of elections are beneficial. Information about the pay of different groups in the public sector is presented as proof of a shared privilege. Uncertainty over raising military payments is inflated into a conclusion that the state is deliberately refusing to support service members.

Target audience

Examples (paraphrased)

We paraphrase rather than quote: propaganda's exact wording is built to spread, so we carry the claim and not the craft. Each example cites the post it came from.

• An MP flaunts a luxurious life while people survive under shelling, so the authorities need neither peace nor elections.

  Резидент, 13 Nov 2026 · Archived copy

• Officials, politicians, security personnel, and judges have received pay rises for years, while service members will get no increase in 2027.

  Резидент, 12 Nov 2026 · Archived copy

We link archived copies rather than the posts themselves, so that checking our work sends no traffic to the source. Where a platform cannot be archived, we print the post's address instead of linking it.

Goal

To deepen distrust of state institutions among service members, their families, and civilians by setting defence needs against the wellbeing of officials.

Techniques used

• Exaggeration or MinimisationMention of one MP’s cars is turned into a sweeping image of elites allegedly benefiting from the continuation of the war.
• Causal OversimplificationUncertainty over raising military payments is portrayed as the result of a deliberate state choice in favour of officials.

The real grievance it exploits

Service members and their families have legitimate concerns about income, social guarantees, and the fair allocation of budget funds during war. Civilians are also troubled by inequality between those in power and people bearing the burden of war.

How to counter

• Technique exposure: Contrasting one politician’s property with military pay substitutes analysis of budget decisions with a morally charged generalization about all officials.
• Reframe: Military pay should be considered separately: through specific budget decisions, their timing, and available support mechanisms, rather than by attributing one shared intent to the entire state.

Sources (all time)

• РезидентTier 1958,455 subscribers
  2 posts · 12–13 Nov 2026

  • 13 Nov · Archived copy
  • 12 Nov · Archived copy