Portraying Ukrainian and European participation as an obstacle to peace talks

What it claims

Ukrainian and European participation in negotiations is portrayed as “derailing” peace, while security demands are cast as a way to prolong the war. Citing the Financial Times, coordination in Abu Dhabi is presented as interference by “globalists” in the negotiation process. Trump’s remarks about the need for an agreement are inflated into a conclusion that Kyiv supposedly does not want fighting to end.

Target audience

Examples (paraphrased)

We paraphrase rather than quote: propaganda's exact wording is built to spread, so we carry the claim and not the craft. Each example cites the post it came from.

• “Globalists” came to Abu Dhabi to derail US peace efforts through disputes over security guarantees.

  ЗеРада, 9 Nov 2026 · Archived copy

• Kyiv does not want an agreement, although Putin is ready to make a deal and end the war.

  ЗеРада, 13 Oct 2026 · Archived copy

We link archived copies rather than the posts themselves, so that checking our work sends no traffic to the source. Where a platform cannot be archived, we print the post's address instead of linking it.

Goal

To persuade Ukrainian and Western audiences to view Kyiv’s and European partners’ participation in negotiations as an obstacle to peace and to doubt the grounds for Ukraine’s security demands.

Techniques used

• Causal OversimplificationEuropean representatives’ participation in consultations is reduced to the reason why negotiations may fail to produce results.
• Loaded LanguageEuropean participants in the negotiations are labeled “globalists”, presenting their presence as hostile to the peace process.

The real grievance it exploits

People in Ukraine and partner countries want the fighting to end and want clear agreements that do not leave their security questions unanswered after the war.

How to counter

• Fact-check: Trilateral consultations in Abu Dhabi were scheduled with Ukraine, the United States and Russia taking part. The fact of separate consultations with European partners does not prove an intent to derail negotiations.
• Prebunk: Be cautious when complex negotiations are explained through a single culprit. Different positions on security guarantees are not the same as rejecting peace.

Sources (all time)

• ЗеРадаTier 1423,274 subscribers
  7 posts · 12 Oct – 9 Nov 2026

  • 9 Nov · t.me/ZeRada1/32970
  • 9 Nov · Archived copy
  • 9 Nov · t.me/ZeRada1/32964
  • 13 Oct · t.me/ZeRada1/32633
  • 13 Oct · t.me/ZeRada1/32631
  • 13 Oct · Archived copy
  • 12 Oct · t.me/ZeRada1/32622
• Лохматый Z НиколаевTier 135,010 subscribers
  1 post · 9 Nov 2026

  • 9 Nov · t.me/L0HMATIY/39400