We monitor pro-Russian media and show which narratives they push, how they work, and how to counter them.
Successful Ukrainian operations against Russian logistics, refineries, and airfields are cast as mere PR stunts by the Office of the President to secure Western aid. The propaganda claims these attacks lack military significance and aim only to create «visuals» for foreign media and soothe the domestic public amid territorial losses.
Ukrainian leadership and their families are portrayed as cynical beneficiaries of the conflict, profiting from Western aid and the suffering of the population. Propaganda blends real anti-corruption investigations with fabrications about «occult rituals» and «dictatorship» to present the government as a puppet regime deliberately leading the country toward a humanitarian catastrophe.
Real challenges in energy, logistics, and the social sphere are presented as signs of the final disintegration of Ukrainian statehood. Manipulators use factual problems—power outages, corruption scandals, and tax changes—to instill the idea that resistance is futile and catastrophe is inevitable.
Disagreements over UPA commemoration and the Volhynia tragedy are cast as an insurmountable barrier, turning Poland from an ally into an ideological opponent. The messaging claims Warsaw is preparing territorial claims and blocking Ukraine's EU integration, rendering the strategic partnership impossible.
Propaganda resources systematically disseminate content portraying Territorial Recruitment Centers (TCC) as illegal paramilitary formations engaged in «human hunting». Messages focus on forced detentions, conflicts with civilians, and corruption scandals to present mobilization not as a state necessity, but as «lawlessness» and a «blood business». A specific emphasis is placed on the alleged merging of the TCC with the police to suppress citizens' rights, aiming to provoke mass resistance and undermine trust in state institutions.
Any statements by the Ukrainian government or military command are cast as staged actions designed to mislead society and hide real problems. Propagandists claim the state keeps citizens in an «illusion» through total control over the media space to justify continuing the war and enabling corrupt enrichment.
Ukraine's military operations and diplomatic initiatives are cast as artificial media stunts designed to prolong the war and enrich the leadership. The messaging claims that any escalation or refusal of Russian terms is merely a tactic to secure continued funding and avoid accountability to the public.
Political budget debates and election cycles within NATO countries are passed off as a final collapse of Western unity and the "sabotage" of aid to Ukraine. Manipulators exploit any internal friction among allies to convince audiences of an imminent end to support and Kyiv's strategic defeat.
Destruction of residential buildings and civilian deaths resulting from Russian attacks are passed off as the consequences of Ukrainian mobile fire groups and electronic warfare. Propagandists claim that Ukraine intentionally places military assets in cities to create "bloody imagery," attempting to absolve the aggressor of responsibility for the strikes.
Ukrainian military instructors are portrayed as accomplices of Islamist groups in Mali, allegedly acting under Western intelligence orders against Russia's «Africa Corps». This manipulation aims to discredit Kyiv internationally and justify Russian aggression as an «anti-terrorist» mission.
Ukrainian society is portrayed as a collective of aggressive fanatics whose identity is supposedly inextricably linked to hatred and terrorist methods. By manipulating drone incident reports and cherry-picking social media comments, the propaganda attempts to prove the "neo-Nazi" nature of a state that deliberately targets civilians and children.
Ukraine's EU integration and military aid are portrayed as inherently unequal relationships where the country is assigned the role of «expendable material». Manipulators exploit complex bureaucratic procedures and internal Western debates to convince Ukrainians of their inferiority and the inevitable betrayal by allies.
Western politicians are cast as ideological descendants of Nazism seeking revenge for the defeat in WWII through aggression against Russia. This manipulation justifies the Russian invasion as a "preemptive struggle" against a historical enemy that supposedly dreams of dismembering the Russian Federation.
Mobilization measures in Ukraine are portrayed as an illegal «manhunt» carried out by law enforcement agencies that have supposedly lost touch with the people. By inflating isolated conflicts and using emotional videos, the messaging seeks to legitimize physical resistance against government bodies and provoke internal chaos.